Skip to main content

Can Northeast Asian Countries Lead the New Waves of TNE?

Over the past two decades, South Korea, Japan, and China have primarily been importers of transnational education (TNE), with numerous Western universities, particularly from the United States and the United Kingdom, establishing campuses in these countries. Collectively, these three countries have imported nearly 60 educational enterprises while exporting only about 15 branch campuses. This stands in stark contrast to the US, UK, and Australia, which account for nearly half of the over 330 international branch campuses (IBCs) worldwide while hosting around 20 foreign campuses.


Japan was the first to experience this influx, with American universities attempting to establish branches since the 1980s. While many endeavors failed, some, like Temple University Japan, have persisted. China hosts the largest number of branch campuses globally, with nearly 50 since 2004, leveraging strategic locations like Hainan’s Yangpu Economic Development Zone. South Korea has also been active in this arena, with the Incheon Global Campus established in 2012 hosting several prestigious international universities.


Recently, these Northeast Asian countries are transitioning from importers to exporters of TNE. For instance, the University of Tsukuba in Japan has established a significant presence in Malaysia, and China has set up several branch campuses in Japan. South Korea, focusing on Central Asia, has implemented policies since 2006 to promote educational exports, resulting in successful initiatives like Inha University and Ajou University's campuses in Uzbekistan.


This shift reflects a broader trend of regionalization in global higher education, moving away from Western hegemony towards a more regionalized landscape. The increasing intra-Asian mobility of students and programs underscores this trend. Northeast Asian countries are now competing to establish their institutions overseas, aiming to attract top talent and enhance their global influence. The potential for these countries to lead new waves of TNE is substantial, driven by strategic planning, international collaboration, and a commitment to high educational standards.


*This is a summary of the article published on University World News in June 2024. For the original work, please visit https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20240618104056943

Comments

  1. "Great job on this Australian Education Loan Guide ! The document checklist is super helpful. I’m starting my application process soon, and this will save me a lot of time."

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Your post on the emotional aspects of preparing for study abroad really resonated with me. It’s not just about logistics; it’s also about mental readiness. Thanks for sharing!"

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Export of Education: Korean Universities' Path to Internationalization in post-COVID World

The COVID-19 pandemic has held sway over the globe for over two years now, yet the fervor of countless experts involved in internationalization at local Korean universities remains undeterred. In January, approximately 230 faculty and staff members from various local universities converged at the 22nd regular general meeting of the Korean Association of International Educators in Jeju. The gathering served as a platform for them to engage in fervent dialogues on innovation and development in international exchange, as well as the management of foreign student recruitment. This could be attributed not only to their concerted efforts toward internationalizing domestic universities, but potentially also to their experience working in American universities operating within Korea. The idea of 'internationalization' has entrenched itself as a top policy priority in our universities for over two decades. Despite apprehensions over rapid quantitative growth and the manifestation of uni

Beyond Traditional Models: Analyzing Tuition Policy Change with Brand-new Conceptual Framework

The university tuition policy is a critical issue from the perspective of "Who should bear the cost of higher education services?" It's a significant higher education policy intertwined with many societal interests and a political agenda, drawing substantial attention from educational policy authorities and the political realm. Research on university tuition fees has largely focused on the justification and development direction of tuition policies in terms of educational finance, social and historical interpretations, and analysis of tuition fee determination processes. Some previous studies have used the Multiple Streams Framework for policy formation and change analysis, but they generally rely on the traditional Kingdon model, resulting in a superficial description of policy change phenomena.  Efforts have been made to refine and apply these models in educational policy analysis, both domestically and internationally. This study combines the Modified Multiple Streams

10 Years of Incheon Global Campus: Achievements, Obstacles, and Future Prospects

In 2012, South Korea initiated a global educational hub called Incheon Global Campus (IGC) as part of government-led efforts to globalize higher education. This article explores the developments at the US campuses in Korea over the past decade. South Korea is globally renowned for its contribution to international student mobility, with roughly 200,000 Korean students enrolled in higher education institutions worldwide in 2020. Notably, the most popular destination was the US, followed by China, Japan, and Canada. However, this student mobility is largely outbound, with the number of Korean students studying abroad significantly outnumbering incoming international students. This has led to a substantial trade deficit in education. In an attempt to balance this situation, the Korean government, inspired by globalisation and international pressures, encouraged educational exchanges by setting up the IGC, inviting prestigious universities to establish campuses in Korea. This initiative ai