Skip to main content

10 Years of Incheon Global Campus: Achievements, Obstacles, and Future Prospects

In 2012, South Korea initiated a global educational hub called Incheon Global Campus (IGC) as part of government-led efforts to globalize higher education. This article explores the developments at the US campuses in Korea over the past decade.

South Korea is globally renowned for its contribution to international student mobility, with roughly 200,000 Korean students enrolled in higher education institutions worldwide in 2020. Notably, the most popular destination was the US, followed by China, Japan, and Canada. However, this student mobility is largely outbound, with the number of Korean students studying abroad significantly outnumbering incoming international students. This has led to a substantial trade deficit in education.

In an attempt to balance this situation, the Korean government, inspired by globalisation and international pressures, encouraged educational exchanges by setting up the IGC, inviting prestigious universities to establish campuses in Korea. This initiative aimed to retain local students seeking foreign education while attracting international students, thereby creating a high-quality learning environment and stimulating economic gains.

Celebrating its 10th anniversary in 2022, the IGC is now home to four foreign educational institutions—three from the US, one from Belgium, and a research center from Stanford University. Enrollment has consistently increased to 3,600 students.

The reasons for foreign universities establishing campuses in Korea vary, but the core motivations include educational and financial considerations. Establishing a presence in Korea allowed these institutions to increase their brand effectiveness, enhance educational and research collaborations, and establish a robust student recruitment pipeline.

Despite the success in enrollment, the IGC has fallen short of diversifying its student population, with 90% of enrollees from Korea. Additionally, the initial ambition of attracting 10,000 students from 10 foreign universities has not been realized. Various stakeholders have questioned the rationale of investing in foreign institutions using Korean taxpayers' money, particularly given the low success in globalizing the learning environment.

With a declining birth rate in Korea and the potential for Korean students to resume studying abroad post-pandemic, the IGC is facing challenges. The government's financial support is also nearing its end. Consequently, the IGC and its institutions must urgently strategize for the future, bearing in mind the country's higher education context and student mobility patterns.

At the national level, a long-term strategic plan for the IGC's development appears lacking, with more attention paid to domestic institutions requiring government support. To ensure the IGC's original intentions are fulfilled, the campus needs to quickly move beyond its 10-year milestone and devise new strategies for the coming decades.

-------------------------------

* Disclaimer

This content is an edited summary of the article published in January 2023 on the PIE Blog. For the original article, please visit https://blog.thepienews.com/2023/01/what-has-happened-at-the-branch-campus-in-korea-for-the-last-10-years.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Export of Education: Korean Universities' Path to Internationalization in post-COVID World

The COVID-19 pandemic has held sway over the globe for over two years now, yet the fervor of countless experts involved in internationalization at local Korean universities remains undeterred. In January, approximately 230 faculty and staff members from various local universities converged at the 22nd regular general meeting of the Korean Association of International Educators in Jeju. The gathering served as a platform for them to engage in fervent dialogues on innovation and development in international exchange, as well as the management of foreign student recruitment. This could be attributed not only to their concerted efforts toward internationalizing domestic universities, but potentially also to their experience working in American universities operating within Korea. The idea of 'internationalization' has entrenched itself as a top policy priority in our universities for over two decades. Despite apprehensions over rapid quantitative growth and the manifestation of uni

Beyond Traditional Models: Analyzing Tuition Policy Change with Brand-new Conceptual Framework

The university tuition policy is a critical issue from the perspective of "Who should bear the cost of higher education services?" It's a significant higher education policy intertwined with many societal interests and a political agenda, drawing substantial attention from educational policy authorities and the political realm. Research on university tuition fees has largely focused on the justification and development direction of tuition policies in terms of educational finance, social and historical interpretations, and analysis of tuition fee determination processes. Some previous studies have used the Multiple Streams Framework for policy formation and change analysis, but they generally rely on the traditional Kingdon model, resulting in a superficial description of policy change phenomena.  Efforts have been made to refine and apply these models in educational policy analysis, both domestically and internationally. This study combines the Modified Multiple Streams