Skip to main content

Analysis of International Branch Campuses in Korea and Japan: Exploring Success Factors

In my recent publication "Analysis of International Branch Campuses in Korea and Japan: Exploring Success Factors" in the Journal of Comparative and International Higher Education, my colleague Yiru Ke and I explored the dynamics of International Branch Campuses in South Korea and Japan by incorporating the Hickey and Davies' framework. However, this isn't just research; it's a journey through the intricate dance of building successful academic outposts abroad, guided by a methodology that blends the nuanced insights of the Modified Grounded Theory Approach with a series of in-depth conversations from over twenty leaders at the IBCs across these two nations.


What emerges from this exploration are not just findings, but vivid stories of what it takes to thrive in the competitive arena of international higher education. It's about the art of fostering enduring partnerships, the steadfast support from parent institutions, the mastery of communication that builds bridges and trust, and the crafting of enrollment strategies as diverse as the student bodies they aim to attract. We also discussed navigating through a labyrinth of regulatory frameworks, not only as a challenge, but as an opportunity to innovate and excel.


This narrative isn't complete without acknowledging the captains of these ships: leaders with an entrepreneurial spirit, who not only champion international education but embody cross-cultural fluency. They are the architects of tailored programs that resonate on a global scale and the builders of teams as diverse as the world itself. Their efforts are a testament to the belief that academic excellence and institutional capacity are not just ideals, but achievable realities.


As we present this analysis, it becomes clear that the story of IBCs in South Korea and Japan is one of resilience, innovation, and the unwavering belief in the power of education to transcend borders. This is more than a contribution to academic discourse; it's a call to action for educators, policymakers, and stakeholders in higher education worldwide to reflect on the lessons learned from these pioneering ventures. In the shifting sands of global education, the success of IBCs offers a beacon of hope and a roadmap for the future of transnational higher education in Northeast Asia.


*Please visit https://www.ojed.org/index.php/jcihe/article/view/5901 for the full paper.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Export of Education: Korean Universities' Path to Internationalization in post-COVID World

The COVID-19 pandemic has held sway over the globe for over two years now, yet the fervor of countless experts involved in internationalization at local Korean universities remains undeterred. In January, approximately 230 faculty and staff members from various local universities converged at the 22nd regular general meeting of the Korean Association of International Educators in Jeju. The gathering served as a platform for them to engage in fervent dialogues on innovation and development in international exchange, as well as the management of foreign student recruitment. This could be attributed not only to their concerted efforts toward internationalizing domestic universities, but potentially also to their experience working in American universities operating within Korea. The idea of 'internationalization' has entrenched itself as a top policy priority in our universities for over two decades. Despite apprehensions over rapid quantitative growth and the manifestation of uni

Beyond Traditional Models: Analyzing Tuition Policy Change with Brand-new Conceptual Framework

The university tuition policy is a critical issue from the perspective of "Who should bear the cost of higher education services?" It's a significant higher education policy intertwined with many societal interests and a political agenda, drawing substantial attention from educational policy authorities and the political realm. Research on university tuition fees has largely focused on the justification and development direction of tuition policies in terms of educational finance, social and historical interpretations, and analysis of tuition fee determination processes. Some previous studies have used the Multiple Streams Framework for policy formation and change analysis, but they generally rely on the traditional Kingdon model, resulting in a superficial description of policy change phenomena.  Efforts have been made to refine and apply these models in educational policy analysis, both domestically and internationally. This study combines the Modified Multiple Streams

10 Years of Incheon Global Campus: Achievements, Obstacles, and Future Prospects

In 2012, South Korea initiated a global educational hub called Incheon Global Campus (IGC) as part of government-led efforts to globalize higher education. This article explores the developments at the US campuses in Korea over the past decade. South Korea is globally renowned for its contribution to international student mobility, with roughly 200,000 Korean students enrolled in higher education institutions worldwide in 2020. Notably, the most popular destination was the US, followed by China, Japan, and Canada. However, this student mobility is largely outbound, with the number of Korean students studying abroad significantly outnumbering incoming international students. This has led to a substantial trade deficit in education. In an attempt to balance this situation, the Korean government, inspired by globalisation and international pressures, encouraged educational exchanges by setting up the IGC, inviting prestigious universities to establish campuses in Korea. This initiative ai